{"id":1144,"date":"2020-08-14T07:41:50","date_gmt":"2020-08-14T07:41:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/voteforpolicies.org.uk\/?p=1144"},"modified":"2023-05-15T09:05:36","modified_gmt":"2023-05-15T09:05:36","slug":"one-vote-one-party-but-how-much-do-we-agree-with-the-party-we-vote-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/voteforpolicies.org.uk\/blog\/one-vote-one-party-but-how-much-do-we-agree-with-the-party-we-vote-for\/","title":{"rendered":"One vote, one party – but how much do we agree with the party we vote for?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Data analysis<\/strong>: We crunched the numbers from the 1.1 million responses to our pre-election survey in 2019. The \u2018average\u2019 respondent bases their political decisions on around 6 issues, and selects policies from three to four different political parties. Just 1.9% of users choose policies from a single party. This article explains our approach to the analysis, and what the results mean for our democracy. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Our democracy works best when education and information are freely available to us all. That\u2019s why being able to make an informed decision when we vote is fundamental to our goal of increasing participation – it\u2019s not just<\/em> about voting, it\u2019s about having the confidence that the party we vote for is the one that best represents the changes we want to see. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
What that means for our campaign to increase turnout, is that we simultaneously need to reduce \u2018non-representation\u2019 (not voting at all) while also reducing the risk of \u2018mis-representation\u2019 by voting with imperfect information – whether that\u2019s media bias, our own bias and our past voting habits, or deliberate misinformation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The risk of mis-representation is clear. From polling some of our users during the 2019 election, 59% of the 1,941 respondents were surprised by the parties they chose policies from, and 31% said they were more likely to vote for a different party as a result. So without the right information, mis-representation when we vote is a common occurrence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The flip side to this, is that having the right information can also raise new challenges. If you have taken our pre-election survey you will most likely have chosen policies from more than one party. When this happens, you will have had to consider other factors – which issues you care most about, trust, party leadership, policies you can\u2019t<\/em> vote for – before choosing the party to give your vote to. That can be a real challenge. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
What we\u2019re asking now, is can<\/em> we distil our preferences down to just one party? To what extent can a single political party ever represent our views? Given that our current voting system means we can choose only one party, if most of us don\u2019t agree with a single party across all issues, does that mean there will always be an aspect of mis-representation when we vote? <\/p>\n\n\n\n
To understand this, we looked at the data from our 2019 election survey. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Analysis of the 2019 survey data<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
As you would expect, security and data protection are fundamental to the work we do. Not only has access to the data discussed in this article been tightly controlled, but the raw survey data itself has been structured in a manner that ensures respondent anonymity is preserved.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n
How many issues do we compare policies for?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vote for Policies received responses from a little over 1 million people in the 2019 survey, with close to 90% of those living in England, 6% in Scotland and 4% in Wales. All but a handful of constituencies were represented, though unsurprisingly responses tended to be clustered around the major towns and cities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Vote for Policies survey (see Figure 1<\/em>) asks respondents to select 1-15 of the policy issues that matter to them, such as Education, Housing and so on. For each issue selected a series of \u201cpolicy sets\u201d is presented, one per party. The respondent chooses from these sets \u2018blind\u2019 and, once all selections are made, the parties behind those policy choices are revealed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n